Difference between Comparative Financial Statement and Common Size Financial Statement
Introduction:
Financial statements are crucial tools for understanding a company’s financial health and performance. They provide detailed information that helps owners, stakeholders, creditors, and investors make informed decisions. Two common ways of presenting financial statements are the comparative financial statement and the common size financial statement. Both serve distinct purposes and offer different insights into a company’s financial data. Understanding the differences between these two methods is essential for commerce students, accountants, and financial analysts.
What is a Comparative Financial Statement?
A comparative financial statement is a financial report that compares the performance of a company over multiple periods. This comparison allows users to track growth, identify trends, and make informed decisions based on historical data. Investors and analysts often use comparative financial statements to assess how a company is performing relative to previous years or against its competitors.
Key Features of Comparative Financial Statements:
- Definition: Compares a company’s financial performance across different periods to measure growth and trends.
- Type of Analysis: Involves horizontal analysis, where financial data from multiple periods are presented side by side.
- Purpose: Used to compare financial performance within a company over time or between companies.
- Comparisons Made By: Uses both absolute numbers and percentages to highlight changes and trends.
What is a Common Size Financial Statement?
A common size financial statement, on the other hand, expresses each line item in the financial statement as a percentage of a base amount, such as total assets or total sales. This method allows for easy comparison across periods and between companies of different sizes by standardizing the data. Common size statements are particularly useful for analyzing the proportionate size of various financial components.
Key Features of Common Size Financial Statements:
- Definition: Presents financial data as percentages of a base amount to facilitate comparison across different periods or companies.
- Type of Analysis: Involves vertical analysis, where each item in the financial statement is expressed as a percentage of a base figure within the same period.
- Purpose: Used to provide insights into the relative size of financial components, making it easier for stakeholders to analyze the financial health of a company.
- Comparisons Made By: Uses percentages only, standardizing the data for easier comparison.
Key Differences Between Comparative and Common Size Financial Statements
Aspect | Comparative Financial Statement | Common Size Financial Statement |
---|---|---|
Definition | Compares a company’s financial performance across different periods to measure growth and trends. | Presents financial information as percentages of a base amount, facilitating comparison across periods or companies. |
Type of Analysis | Horizontal analysis (side-by-side comparison of different periods). | Vertical analysis (each item as a percentage of a base figure within the same period). |
Purpose | Used to compare financial performance within a firm over time or between firms. | Used to analyze the relative size of financial components for stakeholders. |
Comparisons Made By | Uses both absolute numbers and percentages. | Uses only percentages for standardization and easier comparison. |
Conclusion:
Both comparative financial statements and common size financial statements are powerful tools for analyzing a company’s financial data, but they serve different purposes. Comparative financial statements are ideal for tracking performance over time and identifying trends, while common size financial statements are excellent for understanding the proportionate size of various financial components within a single period. Understanding these differences is crucial for anyone involved in financial analysis, accounting, or commerce.